Tuesday, August 30, 2011

The Road 1

The Road is currently a very slow book. It still hasn't really caught my attention yet. I am of course writing this post as i read the book. Seems to make more sense to me in comprehension of the story. As far as the story being post-apocalyptic, the world seems to have "ended" already. Probably due to a depletion of natural resources. This i believe is called Post-Peak Oil on my Wikipedia search. One can inference this because the father went hunting through a can for some fuel for the kerosene lamp. One can also inference that the father and son value education and literature and stories. First noticed when the boy got happy because the father could read him a story with the light of the lamp. Water World, I am Legend, and Zombieland are examples post-apocalyptic literature.
This genre of sci-fi is similar to dystopian fiction because it is set in the future. Another thing is that there is one small thing that seems to have changed in comparison to our world. The fact that we still have natural resources where theirs seem to have depleted. This may also seem to be a failure of technology to some aspect. This genre is different from dystopian fiction because a dystopia is basically a utopia gone wrong, but post apocalyptic there usually isn't anything left to create a society out of. However post-apocalyptic times can cause the beginnings of a dystopian society. Making that society the answer to the apocalypse. Examples of post-apocalyptic and dystopian literature/movies would be Terminator, Book of Eli, Resident Evil, etc..Post-Apocalyptic seems to be sad where dystopian is more the image of happiness. Since each genre has its own circumstances, the people would come with their own way of thinking. It's own values, culture, philosophies, etc... I believe that post-apocalyptic could address the importance of life better than dystopian literature could. This is simply because if the world was about to end then people would have experienced death and would emphasize the value of life and of living.
The road is written in a pretty weird way. If one pays attention and looks they would notice how McCarthy screws up his punctuation. He puts periods where there should be commas. Who in their right mind does that ??? X(
It makes the text weird to read. I don't prefer his style of writing at all because it just doesn't catch my attention at all. So far from what i have read in the book, all the book has done is put me to sleep ever other paragraph. -_- I might become more interested later on in the boo, but so far nothing...
This is what i think of Cormac McCarthy's The Road.

Sunday, August 28, 2011

The End of BNW

John's Character continues to bewilder me till the end. He wishes to live the life a man of ethics and morals as we would in our own society. Thus he doesn't not fit into the society of BNW. This is a comparison purposefully made by Alduous Huxley to show us how we would react, in a sense, if we were in John's shoes. That is assuming that we too have proper ethics of our own. We can see how Shakespeare really shapes John's way of thought and his morals. Shakespeare's words brought a sense of love, of being a child, of mother and father, of truth and tragedy, etc... to John. They made him what we would consider a man, and what the society of BNW would conisder, a Savage.
In the end that is all that he was to them, simply an uncivilized queer savage. We see the beginnings of this "man" or "savage" when he calls Lenina out as whore in his anger. Then again at Linda's (his mother's) deathbed.
It's not surprising that John could not take the ignorance of the society. It was expected of him to go crazy sooner or later while trying to convince others to see the world the way he sees it.
In the end it is a failure. How can one see what one has been deprived of and cannot fathom?
For example, if one attempts to imagine the universe as small as a particle and within a billionth of a billionth of a second to imagine it expand to infinite reaches billions maybe trillions miles across, the idea would seem so immense it becomes improbable in the state of mind. It just isn't within our power to imagine greatness of the universe. That same way the people of BNW that have been so manipulated by hypnopaedia and so restricted cannot attempt to fathom what John is talking on and on about.
It is intriguing watching the conversation between John and Mustapha Mond. It could b considered the one conversation that explains the most about why and how society is the way it is. John asks why it has to b certain ways and gets all his questions answered. There is no end to the immoral and un-ethicalness of the ways of Mustapha Mond and the society. Atleast to John there isn't.
Religion wasn't a topic John was to familiar with. Of course he knew of God and Jesus and the rituals done in Malpais, but he still didn't understand who God really was. That is, until Mustapha Mond introduced him to the Holy Bible.
The two argue about God and religion vs. Civilization. The Controller, Mustapha Mond, does not cease to contradict all that John says in the most deliberate and thoughtful manner.
I beleive the controller does have some good points though. There aren't any wars or any hatred. Everyone gets along in a sense of saying it, "Everyone belongs to everyone." On the other hand John argues that if one has God one has courage, honor, one does good, and most of all one is a true man. This is how I think John strived to live his life.
In the end John and Bernard and Helmholtz are to be sent to the islands to be experimented. with. To me it seems like it all just a game for the controllers. Liek how way play RPG games and we control characters. They play God. They decide who does what and all the details. They decide the rules and whats acceptable or denied. They run the town like a giant factory saying it's for the sake of the laborers, but it isn't really.
John the Savage runs away to live in a light house. He chose that place because of the scenery even though he always doubts whether he deserves it or not. So he constantly asks for forgiveness and prays to God only to be assaulted over and over again by the hordes of people constantly at his door who simply want entertainment. Such society has fallen. Drugged and pleasured they are happy. Even if one of them are hurt or even killed. Such as John did to Lenina as Henry Foster ran away like a wuss. Then John's religious aspect jumps in. His beleif in being a man. He realizes his mistake and to my utter surprise he commits suicide by hanging himself.
All I can say is that John was a hard core man. He lived his life true, unable to change society for the better, but shows how cruel society really is and for all their own selfish reasons. Alduous Huxley shows the faults of man, as well as his upbringings. The rise of a stable society, but also the underlying corruption of it. a "Gilded Age" sort of society to quote Mark Twain. This is what I thought of Alduous Huxley's Brave New World.

"Can Science Be Ethical?

In the article "Can Science be Ethical," Freeman Dyson argued that with evolution of science there must be an evolution of ethics to balance it. Else science would in turn become the destruction of mankind. There are two paths science can take Dyson says. Those paths are for the aid of humanity or to the destruction of humanity.
In BNW, humans are reproduced artificially using science. This concept is said to be void of ethics at the moment explains Dyson. People are skeptical of even Bio-Engineering cats and dogs, never mind human beings. In our world that subject is a sort of taboo. Some people think stem-cell research as unethical. However, Dyson explains that even though things are thought to be so illogical now, as soon as those things can work to save the lives of those people, they will not hesitate to grasp that science.
Humans are hypocritical when it comes to values of ethics and science. They may condemn something as immoral and wrong but the second it works for them, they are ready to fight for it. It's is in itself a vice of science. The destruction of mankind is what science brings said Dysons math teacher Hardy.
BNW shows how science is a tool for the powerful and rich. The World Controllers and the Director has the power to control how science and technology is used.
Then comes the argument of ethics. Sure we have technology and the means to use it, but should we use it for those means?
Sure we can clone but should we clone people or should we clone organs for the survival and the health of people.
Should we mass produce people for labor as in BNW? Should we retard certain beings, as the case is for the Epsilons and other castes in BNW, or use science as a method to manipulate life to get what we want? Isn't that what we do to our pets? Are we any better than the Director?
Such questions of ethics are posed upon our society in comparison to the society in BNW.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Brave New World ch. 6-10

As i am reading this book i realize how different life is for the characters compared to ours, but also how normal they think their lives are in comparison to the other castes. One can notice how people hate on others in the book because they are different and in that same way we too tend to criticize others for things out of their control or things that define who they are. Which also brings up the aspect of what is "free will?" Is there such a thing, or is there only an illusion of "free will?" Bernard talks to Lenina about this in the beginning of chapter six when Bernard wishes to enjoy the waves and the water. He wished to b in the quiet and enjoy nature even he is pitying himself for being different so much more different that all the other Alpha's.
In the book Brave New World everyone takes soma and continuously says everyone is happy yea blah blah etc...However, is everyone really happy because they wish to be and they choose to be happy or because there has been an idea or thought instilled within them that guides their choices giving the illusion of free will being enforced by an outside thought or idea. Like the movie Inception, its a ploy with the brain. In the book they call it "hypnopaedic" I call it playing GOD with those that have no choice and manipulating the weak.
Another aspect that i have noticed is how Lenina and the others like her feel superior to the others and feel disgusted at change or "abnormalities." Plus at any sign of strain, stress, when they really wanna be happy, or make something go by fast they just take some soma and they don't deal with the issues. For example when Lenina and Bernard went the reservation Lenina thought it abnormal to see old people, mothers, and other activities that the "savages" participated in. All Lenina wanted to do was take sum soma and forget about the moment or make it so that she doesn't care.
What i read in the book makes me feel grateful for what i have and the people that i am with.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Brave New World

The terminology in this book is insane. I didn't have the time to complete the 5 chapters, how ever what I did read made me think, "Whoa!!"
Hatcheries?? I'm assuming those are factories where humans are made. The details are so intricate it's like a puzzle for me. As I am not a very good reader it really is rigorous for me to pick out certain aspects of the book and put them together quickly.
I felt pity for the newborns as they were "predestined" to certain positions even before they were born.
As it was a factory like setting, the author made it easier to put two and two together. Since at the time Henry Ford had brought one of the greatest ideas of all, the assembly line. In Brave New World, the author depicted the process through which the babies were born as if it too was an assembly line process. Straight from combining reproductive organs all the way birth of the child.
Everything in the book seems like a dystopia because it's all controlled. There is not much free will as it has been over taken by predestination.
I look forward to actually finishing up the book to actually figure out whats going on in it :P
until then ill be confused for the most bit, but curious for the rest nonetheless.